The interview
What actually happens, from application to offer
Almost nobody explains this part properly, so people arrive at their interview having imagined something far worse than the real thing. Here's the whole sequence, and then the two formats you're likely to meet.
-
You apply, usually twice
Your admissions centre application (UAC, VTAC, QTAC, SATAC or TISC) sets your preferences. Separately, most medical schools want a direct application through their own portal. Graduate applicants generally go through GEMSAS instead, where one application covers ten schools.
More people fall over here than at any interview.
-
Your results and test scores come together
Your academic results reach the university through the admissions centre, and your UCAT or GAMSAT score is sent automatically to the schools you nominated. At JCU there's no test, so a Prediction of Academic Achievement form from your school does this job instead.
-
The university ranks applicants for interview
Each school combines academic results and test scores in its own way to decide who gets invited. Some use a strict threshold, others a weighted formula, and a few assess more holistically. You usually can't tell in advance exactly where the line will sit.
-
The invitation arrives
Often with only a week or two of notice, sometimes by email you nearly miss. It'll tell you the format, the platform and how to book your slot. Slots fill quickly, so book the moment you can.
Start preparing before the invitation, not after it.
-
You sit the interview
Most are now online. You'll be assessed against a set of attributes rather than on whether you knew the right facts, and the interviewers are usually working from a scoring rubric they can't tell you about.
-
Everything is combined for an offer
Interview performance is added to your academic results, and sometimes your test score, in each school's own weighting. Offers come out in the main rounds in December and January.
-
You respond, and you watch your preferences
Accepting, conditionally accepting and deferring all work differently, and preference order still matters between rounds. Getting this wrong at the last step is a genuinely painful way to lose a place.
Formats
MMI or panel, and why it changes everything
These two formats reward genuinely different things. Preparing for one as though it were the other is the most common mistake I see.
MMI
Multiple Mini Interview
- Shape
- A circuit of short stations, usually six to ten, each with its own scenario and its own assessor. You move on when the bell goes.
- Length
- Around five to eight minutes per station, with a minute or two of reading time before each one.
- Who assesses you
- A different person at every station, and they don't see how you did at the others.
- Typical stations
- Ethical dilemmas, a role play with an actor, teamwork or communication tasks, and something about why medicine.
- What it rewards
- Recovering quickly. A poor station genuinely doesn't follow you to the next one.
- Where you'll meet it
- UNSW, Curtin, Western Sydney, Newcastle and New England, and many graduate programs.
- Prepare by
- Drilling short scenarios under time pressure until structuring an answer in ninety seconds feels normal.
Panel
Semi structured interview
- Shape
- One longer conversation with two or three people, working through a set list of questions with follow ups.
- Length
- Usually somewhere between twenty and fifty minutes in a single sitting.
- Who assesses you
- The same panel throughout. At JCU that's typically a health practitioner, an academic and a community member.
- Typical questions
- Motivation, your understanding of the profession, ethical reasoning, and the values the school is built around.
- What it rewards
- Consistency and depth. They'll follow up on what you say, so shallow answers get found out.
- Where you'll meet it
- JCU, and a number of programs that use a semi structured format rather than a circuit.
- Prepare by
- Building a few experiences you can talk about properly, then practising being pushed on them.
What both formats are really looking at
Whatever the shape, assessors are marking much the same qualities. Can you reason through a problem where there isn't a clean answer. Can you hold two competing interests in view at once. Do you listen. Do you know what you're signing up for, in a way that goes past wanting to help people. And can you speak like someone a patient would want to talk to.
None of that can be memorised, which is the good news. It can absolutely be practised, which is where I come in.